Tuesday, September 27, 2005

thoughts on history

I've been thinking a lot lately about whether or not it is possible to get the "definitive version" of history. Well, scratch that. Let's try again. I know the definitive version of history exists, but I've been wondering how rare it is for it to actually make itself known these days.

I have been inhaling Belloc lately, among several others. The man had an uncanny ability to elucidate historical truth. His style is straightforward, and he doesn't bother with the countless useless anecdotes which so often comprise the bulk of modern histories. Reading his work and taking what he presents as fact as such (easily verifiable), one can't help but conclude that he indeed writes the definitive version of the history he presents.

What then of the revisionist? Belloc himself, during the time in which he wrote, was a revisionist, challenging and upsetting the status quo. There is and always will be a genuine desire to seek out historical truth, and though of late this desire is spread thin among a haggard few, it is these few who we may rightfully and respectfully refer to as revisionists. Nevertheless, the zeitgeist seems to dictate that a work need not be really considered historical unless it is more analysis and exegesis than pure fact. Our collective consciousness, so embedded in the framework of a modern liberal arts mindset, demands nothing less.

The question then becomes whether or not the historian himself is qualified to offer a meaningful interpretation of events past as relevant to the present. My own personal belief is that, more often than not, he is not. After all, who is the modern historian? No longer is he the erudite scholar, poring over ancient manuscripts for days by candlelight alone, devoting a lifetime to both preservation and discovery. Nay, the modern historian is first and foremost an author. He is therefore obligated to approach a tried and true subject matter with novel and quirky approaches, in hopes of coming up with something comprehensive enough to print and market. Truly then, nothing is sacred to the modern historian, who thrives on controversy and contention, the two green lights of a sales campaign.

So although the definitive version of history is in fact an actuality, I say it is more likely to be found long published and long forgotten on the library shelf collecting dust, rather than "coming to a bookstand near you." Belloc, Dawson, Pirenne, Haskins, Tocqueville... the list is unending. Yes, the reading cycle has brought me back to history, and I feel I have to share the love with the rest of you.

P.S. Richard, it looks like reform is in your favor.

7 Comments:

At 9:37 AM, September 27, 2005, Blogger Mr. Shife said...

Not fair, Vince. I haven't even had any caffiene yet this morning. My head hurts.

 
At 8:46 PM, September 27, 2005, Blogger j merlino said...

I have read some of Belloc's work and it is a shame that they don't teach the right stuff in colleges anymore.

I think for many, Belloc and C.S. Lewis (and others) are a litle "too Christian", when in reality the truths in much of their writings are universal.

 
At 8:53 PM, September 27, 2005, Blogger T. Leach said...

I agree with you, Vince. If the truth isn't compelling enough to appeal to the masses today, you won't find it in the New Releases section at Barnes & Noble. Revisionism based on anecdotal evidence? That's the shit that sells.

Take the Bible, for example. Many refer to its stories as historical fact. Really, though, they're probably just a collection of embellished stories.

Hey, pass the joint.

 
At 9:25 PM, September 27, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

shife, i'll save substantial posts for the evening edition, just for you

hurricane, it's a sad relativist state of affairs when truth is so easily shrugged off

leach, i'm not sure, but i'll take your bible comment as tongue-in-cheek to stay on the headache-free side of life

i'll pass the bong instead

 
At 9:31 AM, October 01, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

no one can write definitive history, pooint of view is the onle way in which you can describe anything. It also doesnt help that the general way to make yourself known is the prove something "new or novel" about an event that happened 1200 years before your grandparents bumped uglies. Its just like the news if you read the left news the right news and then find some trustworthy statistics you may find yourself close to what really happened.

P.S. read Frederick Jackson Turner, and Patty Limerick. Me and Franky stroke ourselves to their thesis's nightly

 
At 5:23 PM, December 03, 2010, Anonymous true male masturbation stories said...

He threw it up right away and wasnt bothered with aught buta tummy ache and skipped two meals. They might hurt herdaughter.
posts of young sex stories
young sex stories
sexy hindi stories
adult fiction stories
femdom enema stories
He threw it up right away and wasnt bothered with aught buta tummy ache and skipped two meals. They might hurt herdaughter.

 
At 1:45 AM, December 04, 2010, Anonymous teen camping sex stories said...

These people had blown up her house. Its the bottom of the ninth and still all to play for.
son mom stories xxx
family sex stories
free detailed family porn stories
sexy stories to tell your boyfriend
gay stories masturbation
These people had blown up her house. Its the bottom of the ninth and still all to play for.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home